Peak Draghi

Everyone loves ECB day. The set up for this one was particularly good – I like to think of it as ‘Peak Draghi’. Everyone knew what the setup was, and most people were pretty much on the same page. The market confidently expected:

– A 10/15bp cut to the deposit rate
– An increase in the pace of QE by 10bio
– An extension of the length of QE
– Expanding the scope of QE to include corporate bonds, munis
– An extension of TLTRO

But on top of that, as though they felt that it’d give them some kind of edge, most pundits and market participants also felt they needed to tack on some additional, more esoteric announcements. It’s almost as if everyone was stepping over themselves to predict the most surprising dovish thing. On the table was:

– He might hint at eventually buying equities
– Might make the program totally open ended
– Might introduce a two tier depo rate (a penalty rate for excess reserves)

The market moved in the weeks preceding the meeting as each of these ideas was digested, or widely broadcast. I saw tier 1 hedge funds gunning for all kinds of outlandish scenarios in this vein – and not just putting on a wingy option, paying a few cents for a small chance of a big payoff, taking big directional bets in illiquid markets. I was as guilty of this hubris as anyone – and the two tier depo rate business seemed pretty plausible to me – a neat way to get around the issue that by lowering the main refinancing rate, the ECB would pay people money to borrow money from them – which looks a bit too much like helicopter money for people’s taste! The biggest positions were in currencies – where the world and his dog were short Euros anticipating a dovish ECB and a hawkish Fed. In my world, people got long of ASW spreads (partly because of the implications of the two tier thing), and paid 10’s30’s, as well as buying a tonne of short dated calls on Euribors and Schatz, and receiving front end EONIA.

And we all know what happened next. Huge moves in all of those things, against the speculative community. A noticeably downbeat and nervous looking Draghi gave us only 10bp of Depo rate cut, included Muni bonds in QE (which just serves to alleviate the bund shortage, hence arguably a tightening!), and extended the program by 6 months. With staunch opposition from the rest of the governing council, which Jens Wiedman was crowing about on the wires in the immediate aftermath, and no change in the ECB staff forecasts – Mr Draghi had little wiggle room to deliver the knockout blow markets needed. Still this on its own would not have been enough to deliver the carnage we saw, the real issue here was the market pricing in a reaction function that simply wasn’t there.

What do I mean by this? Well, the market had persuaded itself that Draghi was ‘Its kind of guy’. Everyone anticipated that the ECB would perceive what the market expected, and do more. This simply isn’t a stable equilibrium in terms of pricing an event. Market participants with that belief about draghi would like at ANY level of rates – and imagine they must go lower. Ie, whatever is priced now – they would believe the ECB would exceed. They would always buy bunds – no matter what the level. I’ve often observed amongst my colleagues, especially on the trading side, a tendency to have a kind of unhealthy relationship with central bank governors – like some super fans have with celebrities. The reality is, it’s not a two way street. Draghi is not trying to make the Bund go up, or the Euro go down. Those things may help his cause, but he’s not trying to change those things – rather he’s trying to change the real economy. Forgetting that cost a lot of people dear today. In any case – Peak Draghi has been and gone.


5 thoughts on “Peak Draghi

  1. Excellent description of the market’s mind.

    Though, I tend to think that Draghi would have really liked to announce more, and really wants to talk the Euro down. He has proven to be a master communicator after all. But just like in May to June last year, he has just been unable to do so because of the Germans & associated. He probably tried to force the votes in his favor by building up ultra dovish market expectation, but it didn’t work this time. Of course with data improving it was tough to continue to convince.
    To me the market’s mistake is mostly in comparing too much the ECB and the Fed. If Draghi gave more than expected when he announced QE last year, it is above all because he knew he should have acted much earlier.
    And also from the perspective of the ECB being a political beast, I think the piece by Ambrose Pritchard on the AfD’s rise in Germany and how it is likely to affect Merkel (who is in any case in big trouble in march bcse of the syrian policy) is a major issue. And the upcoming likely rise of FN in french regional election is also reflecting the same factor.
    The political factor in core Europe is becoming a really big issue, and necessarily affecting ECB.

    Also I guess the numbers of quant macro HF have become so dominant that it is completely distorting risk / reward analysis. Just look at Oil’s position… when the Saudis just shifted their stance (yes still waiting for Russian and Iran, but still), and USD rally on pause…


    • Clearly the politics have overtaken him. Hes been having Weidman and the CEE central bankers publicly briefing against him for ages, and they won out this time. They in turn are products of more isolationist national politicians. Not ideal.

      On quant funds, not totally sure what you mean, would love to know what you mean by that!

      • Hi there. On quant funds, what I mean is that a macro quant fund is doing something that has essentially nothing to do with a discr macro fund – they just have in common that they like trends, and ideally trends that have a macro engine. But a discr fund tends to have analysis ex-ante for the engine, while the quant fund is often fully in when the trend is strong. A good illustration is how most quant macro funds got killed in the tapering on bonds (may / june 2013) – included bluetrend, while most discr macro weren’t (i wrote a post on the issue in my blog at the time).
        In a sense if you come to econometrics, it is the unability of quant funds to anticipate structural breaks in their models – breaks which are increasingly common nowadays.

  2. shah8 says:

    Yeah, there’s a lot of that going around, given just how few moves there are to be made. For instance, I’d expect some kind of disillusion process with political movements leading to ?market payoff? in South America. Much of the business media are absurdly optimistic about the implications of Argentine/Venezuelan/Brazil political moves. Psssst… There are Jens Wiedman everywheres, guys and girls.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s